related TheAge Newspaper artical .. Anzac Day - Latest Comments/Your Say: http://blogs.theage.com.au/yoursay/archives/ 2006/04/anzac_day.html | April 12, 2006 09:26 AM * http://blogs.theage.com.au/yoursay/archives/2006/04/anzac_day.html (For your interest, you may find the Gul Arslan's two comments at the above address ) Descendants of World
War I Turkish soldiers can march on Anzac Day, the Victorian RSL has
decided, because they were a
very honorable The endorsement does not extend to families of German,
Japanese, Italian or North Vietnamese. What
do you think of this decision? [When the Turks taken an official acceptance
from the Victoria RSL, some comments made by the Australian people ]
See the feedbacks regarding 'Johnny Turk - Honorably
Enemy' 'Theage' newspaper ... |
|
Johnny Turk Introduction
After a sojourn of 7 months in Gallipoli we propose to take some little relaxation...and in bidding 'Au revoir' to our honorable foes we Australians desire to express appreciation of the fine soldierly qualities of our Turkish opponents and of the sportsmanlike manner in which they have participated in a very interesting contest, honourable, we trust , to both sides.
We have left this area and trenches in which we have taken considerable trouble and pride, clean and in good order, and would be grateful if they may be so maintained until our return, particular care being asked in regard to matters of sanitation, so vital to the well being of an army. We hope that you will find the wine, coffee, tobacco, cigarettes and food to your taste, and a supply of fuel has been left in the cupboard to ameliorate in some measure the discomfort during the cold watches of the winter Our only request is that no member of the nation who was guilty of the inhuman murder of that noble woman Miss Edith Clavell to whose photo this message is attached, will be permitted to pollute with his presence the quarters of soldiers who have never descended to such barbarous and ruthless methods. 'Editor: Germans executed the British nurse Edith Clavell in 1915' "I do not pretend to be an historian, and I do not know a great deal about Gallipoli. But I grew up surrounded by the artifacts of war because the men in my family had a facility for dying in them. In the Second World War my mother's three brothers went off to fight Japan. Two of them died. There was a strong hatred of the Japanese in my family (which has passed now) and that detestation extended to the Germans. A generation earlier I had close family members who fought in the First World War; however I was aware from early childhood that clear distinctions were made between enemies, which not even the passage of time could account for. My grandparents' brothers fought the Turks. My grandmother's brother was killed at Gallipoli, while my grandfather's brother survived it, going on later to fight through the whole Middle-Eastern campaign. One of the favorite toys of my childhood was a three-metre intricately beaded snake, made by a Turkish prisoner-of-war for that soldier. The craftsman wove into it 'TURKISH PRISONER 67L', and then the name of my great uncle. Originally, before it got broken, there was a little lizard trapped in the mouth of the snake. Perhaps for the Turk it was a wry joke on his captivity. There were also other momentoes - faded sepia postcards, and letters which I remember reading before they were finally lost. I grew up because of these things with a strong awareness of the Turks, but with no hatred whatsoever. Since childhood I have had an intense interest in that First World War, and in consequence have done much casual reading on it. Conclusion The idea has been increasingly expressed that Gallipoli represents more than war. There are those who suggest that it marks a special friendship sealed in the young blood of two very different countries. This sentiment is somewhat unique - especially once you realize that many of the moves towards redefinition of the relationship have come from the old diggers, "Editor: Digger is the colloquial name for Australian soldier" who on their own initiative and through all the barriers started corresponding with Turks. A number of them have journeyed back. Those who have done so have found Anzac graves well cared for in Turkey for decades - a situation said to be almost without precedent between the opposing forces of two sides once locked in bitter conflict. How many nations have tended their invaders' graves? 1985 marks a special time - the seventieth anniversary of the Gallipoli/Canakkale campaign. What is even more remarkable is that the Turkish Foreign Minister has just opened a memorial to Attack in the War Memorial at Canberra. The place of the original landing in Turkey has been re-named Anzac Cove, in a ceremony attended by all foreign ambassadors. In Albany, Western Australia - a state that gave many of its fine young men to the campaign, and where my own family came from - the Turkish Consul General has named a promontory for Ataturk. I would like to conclude with a statement which appears on many of these war memorials, and one which I believe is very beautiful. It is a message sent by Ataturk in 1934 to be passed on to those people whose sons had fallen in Gallipoli two decades before. He said: "Those heroes that shed their blood and lost their lives, you are now in the soil of a friendly country. Therefore rest in peace. There is no difference between the Johnnies and the Mehmets to us where they lie side by side in this country of ours. You, the mothers, who sent their sons from far away countries, wipe away your tears; your sons are now lying in our bosom and are at peace. After having lost their lives on this land they have become our sons as well." After some conflicts, hatred stays with the nations for generations. But it was not so with Gallipoli. It has never been so for the Turkish and Australian peoples. "Editor: Between April 25 and December 20, 1915, in an area of 20 kilometres by 8, the following numbers of troops were killed: 86,000 Turkish 8,700 Australian 2,700 New Zealanders 27,000 British and Indian" "Editor: While Turkish armies were fighting with British, Anzacs and the French at Gallipoli, they were also fighting the Russians in the Eastern front and British-Arab alliance in the south. At a time when there were no young men left in Anatolian villages, Armenian subjects of the Ottoman Empire collaborated with the Russian invaders.. pillaging and murdering women and children in villages which were left defenseless after all men were conscripted to fight the enemies who were in a feeding frenzy - trying to devour what was left of the collapsing Ottoman Empire. Armenians in border regions were thus deported to southern provinces and many perished during the arduous exodus. Generations of Armenian militants later resorted to vicious terror tactics murdering numerous Turkish diplomats as revenge killings for an alleged genocide during the war years" www.tallarmeniantale.com | Find out the Truth!
Selected Articals: Lloyd Robson wrote: Shortlisted for Children's
Book Council of Australia Eve Pownall Award 2004.
|